Listening Project on Diversity and Outreach

in Baltimore Yearly Meeting

(Conducted by the Baltimore Yearly Meeting

Working Group on Racism Among Friends)

July 2003

 

Introduction

There is nothing new about the Listening Project...thought leads to words leads to action leads to thought. What it is all about is encouragement of appreciation for complexity.

 --David Grant, listening project trainer

 

At its October 20, 2001 session, the Baltimore Yearly Meeting Interim Committee empowered the Yearly Meeting’s Peace and Social Concerns Committee to provide a home for a group focused on issues of diversity and associated injustice.  As those of us who were part of that group, which we named the Working Group on Racism Among Friends, began to meet and ponder our next steps, we decided we needed to learn what we could about the existing views and attitudes of Quakers in BYM on diversity among Friends. It also seemed to us that Friends’ attitudes concerning outreach generally would also be particularly relevant to any effort to address racial diversity in our meetings.

 

We decided to do very detailed and deliberate listening to Friends throughout the Yearly Meeting by undertaking a “listening project.”  We wanted to ask questions about Friends’ thoughts on Quakerism, their Monthly Meeting, racial diversity in the Monthly Meeting, outreach to their neighbors, and what, if anything their Meeting should do about any of these matters We wanted to do it in a manner that would stimulate ideas and deepen discernment.

 

A listening project is not designed to produce hard statistical data, but just such responses. It was developed as a community organizing tool by Herb Walters of Rural Southern Voice for Peace in 1981. Countless Listening Projects have been done around the country on a wide variety of issues including community development, environmental justice, ethnic violence, military spending, isolation and its effect on rural women, the criminal justice system, AIDS, breast feeding, living wages, and child welfare rights. Its power is based on the belief that listening can promote deeper understanding and empower people to work together to solve community problems. We decided to give it a try in Baltimore Yearly Meeting.

 

Bette Hoover, the Director of the American Friends Service Committee D.C. Peace and Economic Justice Program, provided Listening Project training to the Working Group on Racism Among Friends in November 2002. As part of the training workshop, we identified several goals for our Listening Project:

 

1.     Help members of the Working Group better understand  the perspectives of the BYM Friends who are listened to.

2.     Provide Friends who are listened to with an opportunity to explore beliefs and attitudes and behavior and to be heard.

3.     Stimulate discussion and discernment at the BYM annual sessions by distributing and discussing the Listening Project report at Yearly Meeting in August 2003.

4.     Stimulate thought and action on diversity and racism in BYM monthly meetings.

5.     Promote growth and transformative change among the listeners.

6.     Appreciate the benefits of the diversity we have and build on it.

 

We also tested and refined the questionnaire we had been developing since the 2002 BYM annual session. The questionnaire is reprinted at the end of this report.  Interviewing began in earnest in January 2003 and continued through June.

We have listened to 70 Friends from 25 different Monthly Meetings in Baltimore Yearly Meeting.  We made an effort to listen to Friends from all parts of the Yearly Meeting. We did not, however, concern ourselves with whether some meetings were “under represented” or “over represented ” since the goal was to listen to Friends, not to produce statistics.

The Bethesda Friend Meeting Advancement and Outreach Committee decided to undertake the Listening Project as a Meeting activity and listened to 22 Friends from that Meeting--considerably more than were interviewed in any other Meeting.  Interested Friends from Bethesda Friends Meeting have already met twice to discuss what they have learned from their listening and to consider next steps for their Meeting.

In the following pages, all of the indented material is quoted directly from the interviews.


Part I: Life in our Meetings

1.  Length of Quaker experience

Everyone we listened to has been Quaker for a number of years; though some as few as three years. Some have been attending Meeting for decades, and one person for 61 years. Most were clerks or otherwise active in their Meetings. Just over one quarter have been with the same Meeting the entire time they have been Quakers.

2.   What do you like about your Meeting?

We heard that Friends like their Meetings for a variety of reasons, but the most frequently mentioned ones were community, family, spirituality, and people.

Friends found the Meeting community...

deep

open

strong

spiritually led

spiritual

nurturing

a lot of love

hospitality and warmth

acceptance, tolerance

dynamic and active

intellectual, friendly

It’s a small Meeting (about five people regularly at this time) and we know each other well.

Some told us the Meeting is good for their families...

very family oriented

sense of family

support for family life

so many families

It doesn't matter what your family looks like

As a widow you can be an equal participant

embraces children

gives attention to children

Some emphasized spiritual aspects...

the Spirit is here

spiritual home

spiritual leadership

respect for youth spirituality

Meeting tends to become more spiritual when things are happening, although we sometimes need reminding.

theology

a place where I can be reminded that God and I have a relationship

the idea of direct communication with God

the inner voice

continuing revelation

centeredness

sense of calm

Social activism of the Meeting was important for many...

has a political and social consciousness,

concerned with social justice

involved in social issues

our involvement with the larger world

activism

outreach of Quaker Meetings

Others were drawn by what they found in their fellow-worshipers...

very warm and kind

very loving and caring

like minded folk

friendly, relaxed and kind of wacky

open minded and accepting

people listen carefully to each other

elders

people of all ages

wonderful people

a lot of smart people to learn a lot from

For some, the support they felt was especially important...

support given to people in difficulty

the tone with which help was given

support members feel for each other

mentoring

A number mentioned aspects of the worship...

quality of both silence and vocal ministry in worship

its silence

contemplation

the messages

thoughtful messages

intellectual and spiritual depth in messages

Some appreciated that their Meeting challenged them...

being continually challenged to grow

a challenging mix of views

challenging and interesting

Some mentioned the role the Meeting plays in their life...

a place I can be a member and provide leadership and service

center of my life

Meeting will listen to you if you hit it over the head often enough

I feel like I've found a home here

The friendships

I look forward to coming every Sunday. I feel like a sponge!

Here are a few other interesting reasons we heard...

concerned with actual living, practical

what you said was how you lived your life

close to home so I can bike there

has history

has answered all things

structure is hidden but logical, can be discerned with patience

Its egalitarianism. As soon as you walk in the door you have all the privileges of membership. I have been to other meetings that were not necessarily like that.

 

3.   If you could change one aspect of this Meeting, what would it be?

About every fifth Friend we listened to said there was nothing they would like to change. Many others, however, would like a change in the messages they hear during worship...

There were also many who said they would like their Meeting to be more diverse...

Other changes desired included...

4.   What do you find most valuable about Quakerism?

Many Friends told us they greatly valued the notion of that of God in everyone...

not seeing anyone as better or worse, there is goodness in everyone.

Many also valued the social action in Quakerism...

the way we treat each other in community.

Other responses we heard...

Openness — being open-hearted and open-minded, seeking

spiritual focus

a way of living, the peace testimony

personal relationship with God

acceptance; lack of rules and ritual

continuing revelation

inner light and following one's leadings

silent worship

Quaker process

sense of belonging

application to parenthood

value of questioning

appreciation of nature

willing to listen

commitment to outreach

equality

honesty

democratic structure

everyone is encouraged to participate

It’s non-judgmental, but calls Friends to a higher standard — not, “you’re wrong”, but “you’re accountable.”

slow, patient responses and judgment about people

The orneryness, mysticism, and institutional mysticism.


Part II: Diversity, Racism
and Quakers

1.   Do you think Quakerism appeals differently to some ethnic groups than others?  What accounts for the lack of diversity in many of our Meetings?

Many thought the appeal was universal...

Others chose to answer this question by mentioning social status or education...

Some did try to differentiate ethnic or racial differences...

Others considered Quakerism might not appeal to those from different religious traditions...

Our lack of music and silence during worship were two aspects of Quakerism often mentioned....

And some found this question unanswerable...

2.   How important is the racial and ethnic composition of our meetings?  How would we change if we became more diverse?

Some of us did not think such a change important...

A few opposed such a change...

A few had concerns about what might happen to the spiritual or social life of the meeting...

But the effort would be worth it if we could make it...

Many thought it very important and would be a major positive change in our meetings...

Benefits would include...

And it would be right, since...

 

3.  If some aspect of the culture of the Meeting makes others feel uncomfortable, what ideas do you have about how the Meeting could address their discomfort?

Several Friends thought discomfort was inevitable when someone first attends Meeting...

Many Friends said we need to talk openly about the problem...

Friends said Meetings need to be flexible...

 

4. How important do you think it is to let people nearby know about the Meeting and Quakerism?

 Many Friends support efforts to let our neighbors know about Quakers and some of them told us why they think so...

 

Others opposed overt efforts at publicizing the Meeting or Quakerism...

 Some urged moderation...

5. How active would you like the Meeting to be in working to become more diverse?

Many Friends thought we should go forward, but cautiously...

Some emphasized the problems in trying to attain more diversity...

There were positive suggestions...

 

Part III: Suggestions for the future

1. Describe any outreach of which you are aware.

Several Friends inform others about Quakerism through their everyday relationships...

Meetings perform many types of outreach...

Friends had lots of other ideas...

Some expressed reservations...

Many meeting houses are used by other groups...

Participation in community groups or projects, corporately or individually, connects us with like-minded people...

Witnessing for peace is a form of outreach...

Some Friends get to know diverse people through Quaker organizations... 

Some Friends exchange visits with other congregations...

Others participate in interfaith coalitions....

We could imitate other congregations’ successful strategies...

Friends spoke of schools as an inroad to Quakerism...

2.  What are some ways the Meeting could be more welcoming to people of different cultures and backgrounds?

Friends had suggestions that could apply to any visitor. Many feel we should be more welcoming of visitors and less distracted by our friends and Meeting obligations after worship...

Friends had suggestions for helping integrate people into the Meeting...

Some feel that white Friends are not always racially sensitive or aware...